Subscribe | Read e-Paper
All | Jobs | Homes & Rentals | Stuff | Autos | Services | Notices | Coupons Place your ad
  • Site Search
  • Local Search
Search by: business name business type
   
  • Home
  • News
    • Local
    • Election 2009
    • Local Documents
    • Business
    • Features
    • State
    • World & National
    • Health
  • Sports
    • High School
    • 2009 Rivalry Week
    • UConn
    • Recreation Leagues
    • Pro Football Challenge
  • Community
    • Meriden
    • Wallingford
    • Southington
    • Cheshire
  • Opinion
    • Editorial
    • Columns
  • Obituaries
  • Forums
  • Blogs
  • Videos
  • Photos
    • Newspaper Photos
    • Were You Spotted?
    • Photo Contests
    • Photo Slideshows
  • Entertainment
    • TV Book
    • Movie Reviews
  • Contact Us
    • Staff List
    • R-J Scholarships
    • Submit an Announcement
Home : MyRecordJournal : News : Local News
Local News
Council votes down redirection of turf grant
By: Jesse Buchanan, Record-Journal staff
10/13/2009
email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendly
CHESHIRE - The Town Council on Tuesday defeated a Republican motion to redirect $525,000 in state grant money from artificial turf for the football field to the rebuilding of the boys locker room at Cheshire High School.

Democrats Mathew Altieri, Laura De Caprio, Sheldon Dill, Michael Ecke and Matt Hall voted against the motion while Republicans Tom Ruocco, James Sima, Tim Slocum and Tim White supported it.

Democrats were concerned that the money would be lost if it were not used for the grant's stated purpose: artificial turf. Slocum and other Republicans were concerned about the fiscal impact and the unknowns in the plan to install artificial turf.

"There's no firm cost estimates, and any cost estimates presented are north by several hundred thousand dollars of the amount estimated to complete the project," he said. "There's an identified, pressing need at the sports complex; it's the boys locker room."

Supporters of the artificial turf field have said it could be used much more frequently than the current natural turf field.

The grant has been a divisive issue, with Republicans opposing the use of it for turf and Democrats supporting it. Last year, the grant was accepted by the council when the Democratic majority prevailed in a party-line vote.

Republicans have criticized the grant process, saying it came from a "slush fund" with little legislative oversight.

"The only thing I'm trying to do is be as fiscally responsible with state taxpayers' money as with local taxpayers' dollars," Ruocco said.

Republican councilors said the cost could be $800,000 to $1.1 million, and was not enough of a priority, particularly in tight times.

Altieri contested the idea that the grant had come to the town through a sloppy process.

"We did ask for this and put it on the list and requested this," he said. "This was not a slush fund. There are no slush funds in the state of Connecticut."

Altieri said he was told by state Rep. Mary G. Fritz, D-Wallingford, that there was little likelihood that the state Bonding Commission would approve a reallocated grant. Fritz was partially responsible for getting the grant.

"Could we do it? Maybe, but we could lose the whole grant," Altieri said. "I'm not willing to take that risk."

More than two dozen residents were present, and almost all who spoke were in favor of the turf. Rob Oris, a member of the ad-hoc turf committee tasked with studying the feasibility of artificial turf, asked the council to let the committee present its report before making a decision.

"I suggest that it's probably political season and it's nothing more than grandstanding," Oris said of the proposed motion. "I can't believe there is any other reason you would do this."

Some of the councilors agreed with Oris' sentiment.

"If there wasn't an election in November we wouldn't be sitting here right now," Ecke said.

Matt Bowman, a Democratic candidate for Town Council, said the turf was a priority for the town.

"(The football field) is deteriorating and it's deteriorating rapidly," he said. "We need this facility and we need it now."

jbuchanan@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2230


©www.MyRecordJournal.com 2009

Reader Comments
 Submit your own comment!
Added: Thursday October 15, 2009 at 10:40 AM EST
The turf field
The issue raised the other night was NOT about whether to install this field, it was about the money that the State allocated in a grant for the turf field. This was the topic some 18 months agao, when there was over a 3 hour discussion about whether or not to accept the grant, which was asked for by the Town. At that time it was argued that this money was "slush" fund money and we should not accept it, although that same Council member then decided it was a good idea to accept the money, as long as it could be used for the pool. We were informed at that time that if you ask for the grant to be re-written that the State would, in all likelihood, keep the money and allocate it to another town. Nothing has changed on that in the last 18 months, nothing. The Town Council and BOE charged an ad-hoc committee with the task of investigating all of the issues surrounding the turf field. Their work is near completion and will be presented in the very near future. Why not let them finish their task and then we can decide if it is worth pursuing or if it is deemed not viable, then we can ask the State for a redirection of these funds.

If anyone in town is that concerned over the health issues of a turf field, then I would strongly suggest that you not allow your children to participate in any event in any other town that involves a turf field, unless the potential turf field in Cheshire is the ONLY one that poses potential health risks.

I would also suggest that the folks in town make a mental note, if not a written log, everytime there is an event, big or small, that is held on the high school field. The potential use of the turf field, if it is deemed a viable and safe option, is much more than 5 football games a year. It potentially would be the home field, as I understand it, to the high school football team, high school field hockey, high school lacrosse, high school soccer, Cheshire Junior Football games,Cheshire Lacrosse Club, Music in Motion,CIAC State championship games (which includes a revenue stream for the event), Relay for Life, Graduation, etc. The current conditions allow for a little over 100 events per year, unfortunately once a couple of the bigger ones are held, the field becomes delapitated, which could cause both minor and major injuries to users. The proposed turf field would create the opportunity to host well over 200 events per year, with many of them producing revenue that could be utilized for the long term maintenance of the field.

So, we don't need it because when you and I were kids we got muddy and that was okay? That's a sound reason. We don't need it because it will cost too much? Well, there are organizations in town that have earmarked and continue to earmark monies towards the field, which will greatly reduce or eliminate the need for the town to have any initial outlay when you combine with the State grant money. We don't need it because it is potentially harmful to the kids health? Have you been in some of the bathrooms and locker rooms lately? They are a bredding ground, even when cleaned on a regular basis, for all sorts of infections and illnesses, so make sure your kids don't use any of those facilities either.

The bottom line from the other night's proposal for the turf grant money is that to even propose changing it at tis point is political grandstanding on a candidates part, disrespectful to the members of the ad-hoc committee, and an insult to every taxpayer, parent and student in the town.

Take a good hard look at the conditions of our school systems facilities and see what we, as a Town, subject the children of our Town to on a daily basis. If you really take a look I am sure you would be embarrassed and taken aback. Our Town, which we all arrogantly think provides such a great school system, and the very reason that a good majority of people moved to or stayed in the town for, has allowed many of the facilities within the system to deteriorate over the years, by not allocating proper funding to using a "bandaid" approach towards repairs.

The high school athletic facility is where the majority of major events occur in our town, just drive by on any day. Shouldn't the facility be something that we can be proud of? Shouldn't we, as a town, ensure that the kids that enter our school buildings each and every day are entering a healthy, safe, and well maintained facility? Don't they deserve that? Shouldn't they expect that? At the end of the day, their education, which encompasses much more than the classroom activity (which is the backbone and most important part), is the primary goal of our school system.
Rob Daly, Cheshire, CT
Added: Wednesday October 14, 2009 at 09:16 AM EST
Does Bowman's kids play on this field?
If a brief Google search on the safety of artificial turf reveals the following, then why would anyone want to support the construction of a field that is potentially dangerous to those we're building it for to begin with????

The two artificial turf fields in Ridegfield, CT, now come with warning labels. They include washing hands thoroughly and watching the temperature on hot days, when the artificial turf, filled in with black rubber crumbs, can absorb and release heat, jacking up the temperature on playing fields.

A nylon artificial turf field was closed in Hoboken, N.J., in 2008 when tests found elevated lead dust. http://bit.ly/5VrPS

Over the past year, federal and state agencies have launched their own studies, and issued conflicting findings. School and municipal officials have reopened most of the fields, although safety questions have lingered.

Though children can touch the surfaces and ingest lead dust, the amounts are not dangerous, the commission found. Inhalation of significant dust is not likely, the commission said.

But at the same time, the Centers for Disease Control issued advisories to parents and field managers to take precautions to reduce exposure. Lead can cause brain and neurological ailments.
Christopher Zurcher, New Haven, CT
Added: Wednesday October 14, 2009 at 06:26 AM EST
We don't need artificial turf!
When I was a kid ,I played on natural grass just like millions of others in their youth. When it rained, guess what?, it got muddy !! We got over it. Sometimes a little adversity in your life is a good thing. Add some drainage work, cut the grass and let's get on with more important things.
Gil Linder, Cheshire, CT

email this storyEmail to a friendpost a commentPost a Commentprinter friendlyPrinter-friendlyTop
More from this section...
City's WW2 vets thanked for job well done
Southington anti-porn group holds prayer meeting
Trail to donate $87,000
Overall seasonal hiring down from last year
Street preacher has Lord and law on his side
More Local News


Bookmark and Share

Email:
Local advertising by PaperG


  • RJ Blogs
  • Community Blogs
  • Forums
Go to RJ Blogs
Go to Community Blogs
Jump to:
Go to Forums homepage
More Featured Jobs
More Featured Autos
Events Calendar
<< December >>
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
29 30 1 2 3 4 5 Wk
6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Wk
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Wk
20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Wk
27 28 29 30 31 01 02 Wk
Add or Edit an Event
Today is December 01, 2009

Email:

Our Weekly Newspapers
The Berlin Citizen
The North Haven Citizen
The Plainville Citizen
The Southington Citizen
Town Times
Our Community Partners
MidState Medical Center
Meriden Daffodil Festival
Wallingford Family YMCA/Wint Filipek Sr. Memorial Tennis Tournament
Literacy Volunteers of Greater New Haven
© Record-Journal | 11 Crown Street, PO Box 915 | Meriden, CT 06450
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | Subscribe | Help | Make this your Home Page | Feedback