Democrats were concerned that the money would be lost if it were not used for the grant's stated purpose: artificial turf. Slocum and other Republicans were concerned about the fiscal impact and the unknowns in the plan to install artificial turf.
"There's no firm cost estimates, and any cost estimates presented are north by several hundred thousand dollars of the amount estimated to complete the project," he said. "There's an identified, pressing need at the sports complex; it's the boys locker room."
Supporters of the artificial turf field have said it could be used much more frequently than the current natural turf field.
The grant has been a divisive issue, with Republicans opposing the use of it for turf and Democrats supporting it. Last year, the grant was accepted by the council when the Democratic majority prevailed in a party-line vote.
Republicans have criticized the grant process, saying it came from a "slush fund" with little legislative oversight.
"The only thing I'm trying to do is be as fiscally responsible with state taxpayers' money as with local taxpayers' dollars," Ruocco said.
Republican councilors said the cost could be $800,000 to $1.1 million, and was not enough of a priority, particularly in tight times.
Altieri contested the idea that the grant had come to the town through a sloppy process.
"We did ask for this and put it on the list and requested this," he said. "This was not a slush fund. There are no slush funds in the state of Connecticut."
Altieri said he was told by state Rep. Mary G. Fritz, D-Wallingford, that there was little likelihood that the state Bonding Commission would approve a reallocated grant. Fritz was partially responsible for getting the grant.
"Could we do it? Maybe, but we could lose the whole grant," Altieri said. "I'm not willing to take that risk."
More than two dozen residents were present, and almost all who spoke were in favor of the turf. Rob Oris, a member of the ad-hoc turf committee tasked with studying the feasibility of artificial turf, asked the council to let the committee present its report before making a decision.
"I suggest that it's probably political season and it's nothing more than grandstanding," Oris said of the proposed motion. "I can't believe there is any other reason you would do this."
Some of the councilors agreed with Oris' sentiment.
"If there wasn't an election in November we wouldn't be sitting here right now," Ecke said.
Matt Bowman, a Democratic candidate for Town Council, said the turf was a priority for the town.
"(The football field) is deteriorating and it's deteriorating rapidly," he said. "We need this facility and we need it now."
jbuchanan@record-journal.com
(203) 317-2230


